Medium Risk

Tata Steel Limited

Metal and metal products

CIN: L27100MH1907PLC000260 FY: - Revenue: ₹132,516.7 Cr
6.3
ESG Risk
Score /10
Waste IntensityCompliance RiskGhg Intensity

Risk Breakdown

GHG Intensity
5.0
Water Intensity
5.0
Waste Intensity
10.0
EPR Exposure
5.0
Compliance Risk
10.0
HR Risk
3.0
Governance Risk
3.0

Financial Exposure

Est. Compliance Cost₹212–795 crore
EPR ApplicableUnknown
Scope 1 Emissions— tCO2e
Scope 2 Emissions— tCO2e
Water Withdrawal— m³
Waste Generated17,352,473.0 T

Governance

Anti-Corruption PolicyYes
Conflict of Interest PolicyYes
BRSR AssurancePartial
Assurance ProviderPrice Waterhouse & Co Chartered Accountants LLP

Double Materiality

Financial Materiality6.3
Impact Materiality6.2
QuadrantDual Materiality

Supply Chain

MSME Sourcing0.1%
Lifecycle AssessmentYes
Product ReclaimYes

⚠ Data Anomaly Flags

Automated sector-relative analysis of public BRSR data. Not a regulatory determination.

Sector Risk Outlier ESG risk 6.3 is 1.1σ above sector mean (5.6)

Material Risks

e-waste

ESG Targets & Commitments

TopicTarget / MetricStatus
Life Cycle Assessment LCA conducted for products Achieved
Human Rights in Supply Chain HR clauses in all contracts Commitment

AI Risk Summary

**TATA STEEL LIMITED – FINANCIAL RISK SUMMARY** Tata Steel faces its largest financial exposure through compliance risk (10.0/10 score), with estimated remediation costs of ₹212–795 crore under SEBI BRSR Core Expansion requirements and sectoral environmental disclosures, coupled with potential delisting risk for top-tier companies failing to meet mandatory reporting standards. The company's medium-risk ESG profile is primarily driven by waste intensity and GHG intensity challenges; while Scope 1/2 emission data is unavailable in the dataset, the steel sector's carbon-heavy operations suggest significant exposure to India's Carbon Credit Trading Scheme at ₹600–900/tonne CO2e, which could materially impact operational margins if emissions exceed regulatory thresholds. Water intensity risk (5.0/10) and EPR compliance gaps present secondary financial liabilities, particularly if extended producer responsibility obligations are triggered for steel products. Immediate priority: clarification of actual Scope 1/2 emissions, verification of BRSR P6 compliance status, and quantification of carbon liability under India's emerging carbon pricing mechanisms

Source: Tata Steel Limited BRSR Filing, FY -. Derived from the company's own public disclosures. Not investment advice or a regulatory determination.

← Back to ESG Quotient Dashboard Share on LinkedIn Browse all companies →