Risk Breakdown
Financial Exposure
Governance
Double Materiality
Supply Chain
Material Risks
ESG Targets & Commitments
| Topic | Target / Metric | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Human Rights in Supply Chain | HR clauses in all contracts | Commitment |
AI Risk Summary
**CRISIL Limited – ESG Financial Risk Summary** CRISIL faces material compliance risk as its highest-rated ESG exposure (10.0/10), with estimated remediation costs of ₹6–22 crore under SEBI BRSR Core Expansion obligations; non-compliance risks include potential enforcement action and delisting exposure for this top-tier listed entity. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) represents the second-largest financial exposure (6.5/10 risk score) with undefined applicability status, creating contingent liability uncertainty that could materially impact profitability if product-level EPR obligations are triggered. The company's undisclosed Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions data creates regulatory ambiguity under BRSR P6 environmental disclosures, leaving quantifiable carbon liability exposure unquantified against India's carbon credit trading scheme (₹600–900/tonne). Immediate priority: clarify EPR applicability scope and complete Scope 1/2 emissions inventory to assess actual compliance cost exposure and avoid SEBI enforcement action.
Source: Crisil Limited BRSR Filing, FY 2025-2025. Derived from the company's own public disclosures. Not investment advice or a regulatory determination.